So, I have been playing with the DimExpert tool to apply annotation dimension and GD&T on models. \u00a0I really like this tool to a point.<\/p>\n
My concern is that to date there is no real good modeling standard that I have seen that encourages modeling that enables easliy changing models for design changes. \u00a0Most of the time when I had to do eco’s most of my time was spent trying to figure out someones mental state when they created the model. \u00a0Then I had to make my changes followed up by a model comparison to ensure that I did not inadvertantly screw something up with my changes. \u00a0What should have taken minutes and been simple became hours and mundane even frusturating.<\/p>\n
With this cool new tool I fear that models will continually become harder to edit when it comes to change or data reuse. \u00a0The DimXpert for those who have not played with it yet enables the user to create models in any manner then when the user is ready for detailing they select the DimXpert tool which allows them to added driven dimensions to the model’s annotation view making the detailing process easier and more accurate.<\/p>\n
In my mind this tool is a pandoras box that enables SW users to continue modeling without any regard to fututre changes or data reusage. \u00a0For this tool to be effective, when this tool is activated the dimesnions that it adds would need to somehow convert the sketched and feature dims to driven and the added dimnsions added by the tool then become the parametric driving dimensions. \u00a0Ooh ohh, that would be nice. \u00a0Difficult (Quoting Rick Chin and John Hirschtek) this is the Absurdly Ideal DimXpert.<\/p>\n
Try this tool out. \u00a0Let me know if I am off my rocker or not. \u00a0By the way – When using this for GD&T it is soooooo much easier and correct than attempting at the sketch level.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"