New video from SolidWorks talks about macros that are available on 3DContentCentral.
New video from SolidWorks talks about macros that are available on 3DContentCentral.
As mentioned within a previous article, Jeff Ray quoted one of my comments about SolidWorks 2010. He has been using this quote and others by other bloggers for a few months. It was an honor to have my particular quote appear at SolidWorks World 2010 on the big screen.

I was kinda bummed though. I didn’t have the camera on my phone ready to take a photo, nor did I think about taking a photo until it was too late. Well, even if I had been able to take the photo, it wouldn’t have been that good. Several of us bloggers where sitting in the front row, too close to get Ray and the quote in the same frame.
Yesterday, I put out a call on Twitter to see if anyone had taken a photo of the quote. Gabi Jack almost immediately tweeted that she might have one. Within 15 minutes, she send over a picture of my name in lights next to Ray. Thank you, Jack.

Ray stated the quote during the Monday General Session. This can actually be seen on the video of the Monday General Session (@ minute 47:35) available at their website here.
SolidWorks World 2010 presentations are now available online via the SolidWorks World website. Details about every presentation can be found there. Videos are available for many of the sessions. Where videos do not exist, the PowerPoint presentations are usually available for download. Anyone can view the basic presentation descriptions. Viewing of the videos or downloading of the PowerPoint presentations requires the visitor to sign in through the customer portal. Browsing the presentations may be done with four tabs: Presenter, Title, Category, and Weekday. If you are interested in just videos, there’s an option to filter for those. There is no search function, though that isn’t needed as far as I can tell so far. I’ve been able to find sessions fairly quickly. Also, fortunately, the SolidWorks World 2009 presentations are still available.
At this website, there’s also a SolidWorks blog portal, photos from SolidWorks World 2010, Partner Pavilion information, a convention highlight video. Have fun exploring:
I recently wrote a quick article about the fact that SolidWorks will be renaming DWGEditor due to a settlement with Autodesk. This article prompted a few entertaining responses from twitter, which I hope no one minds me republishing:
DevonSowell @fcsuper DWGEditor and AutoCAD, proud to say I haven’t used either in almost 2 years, they feel like the 80’s
marcnelson @fcsuper There are some great new names for the DWGEditor. AutoCADSuxWorks has to be my favorite tho
hallga @fcsuper I always looked at the name, “DWGEditor” as free marketing for AutoDesk. Guess they didn’t see it that way. :-\
Lars_Denmark RT @fcsuper #DWGEditor is going to be renamed http://goo.gl/fb/JERf #solidworks #news #autodesk #dwg ~NaughtyWorks funny funny
gkastner Opine RT @fcsuper: #DWGEditor is going to be renamed http://bit.ly/bBaNAd #solidworks #news #autodesk #dwg
hallga @fcsuper Well…at least now Autodesk can claim that they beat SW at something.
An eye-catching subject line popped up on the SolidWorks Forum on Monday (2/22/2010), “If you are thinking of designing a nuclear plant – don’t”. It seems there was a recent and humorous addition to the SolidWorks software EULA.
Neither the Software nor any of its components are intended for use in the design or operation of nuclear facilities, life support systems, aircraft or other activities in which the failure of the Software or such components, or both, could lead to death, personal injury, or severe physical or environmental damage.
Seriously, what lawyer thought this statement would be a good thing? First, portions of EULAs (or any nonnegotiable contracts) that are not supported by law are not legally binding. Second, if a company demonstrates the use of the product in a way that is counter to their disclaimers, it may be interpreted as there being no disclaimer at all. Third, words that try to limit liability (such as waivers) aren’t usually legally supported either (even in a physically signed contract). Really, why put these words in a EULA?
Matt West noticed the thread and proactively responded:

Even more humorous is the fact that a SolidWorks customer, who manufacturers aircraft, was profiled at SolidWorks World 2009 in Florida, and mentioned again this year in Anaheim, CA. But of course there’s more. Officially, the SolidWorks website has a page that advertises SolidWorks as Aerospace and Defense software! Not only is this advertising SolidWorks specifically for airplanes, it is also being advertised for Defense, which often designs equipment to specifically cause “death, personal injury, or severe physical or environmental damage.”
What would be more helpful than a “not intended for” statement? Customers need actual information as to why SoldWorks Corp is concerned about this topic. The customer would be better served if they are made aware of software limitations. Just adding a EULA statement just makes for a funny joke, while providing no service to the customer.
With that said, I’m not making any statements here that haven’t been made somewhere else. I’m posting this article in a light-hearted tease, to point out how a company can get so caught up in being a corporation, they miss basic stuff at the ground level.