It may correct per the Standard, but it’s not pretty (until you see the alternatives)

An interesting thread appeared on the SolidWorks Forum this earlier this month. A SolidWorks user posted a question asking how to flip dimension text from one side of a dimension line to the other, for an ISO Standard drawing. The perceived problem was that a non-orthogonal linear dimension appears backwards to nearby orthogonal linear dimensions. Is this correct per the Standard?

Should this Dimension be flipped?

Why would SolidWorks put dimension text on the wrong side of the dimension line? The user noted that if the dimension is placed on an opposite part (or other side view), the dimension text placement appears to be correct.

Dimension text seems correct here!

Actually, according to ISO standard, the 0.82 dimension is correct in both views! This is because the standard requires the dimension text to be in the most upright position. So, although vertically aligned text is required for vertical dimensions, dimension text should never actually be upside-down. This is a case where SolidWorks is following the rules of the standard, but the standard’s rules produce an affect that seems out of place to some users.

But are the alternatives actually better?

What would a flipped dimension look like in this case? What is really the expectation? As it turns out, this answer isn’t so simple, nor is it pretty. There is an ambiguity between two possible methods to flip this dimension.


Does this seem correct?

Although the 0.82 has the same reading direction as the 1.00 dimension, because 0.82 is nearly upside down, it is difficult to read.

Easier to read, but now it is oppose to other dimensions

This method is easier to read. But it still looks incorrect because it is actually opposed to other nearby dimensions. It also appears to be incorrect because now the dimension line is on top of the dimension text, which is more confusing (especially if you have a crowded drawing).

In general, this is a case where something may not appear correct at first, but once you see the alternatives, it really does make sense. These are the reasons why SolidWorks doesn’t support “flipped dimension text”. However, if you would like to use either of these alternatives, there is a workaround. Perhaps I will cover it in a future article.

What if you still want another solution?

There is one aesthetically pleasing alternative that SolidWorks and certain standards do support.

  1. Select Offset Text in PropertyManagerHighlight (select) the dimension.
  2. In the PropertyManager, select the Offset Text button.  The dimension text will now be attached to a leader that points to the center of the dimension line.  If this is fine, then you are done.
  3. For ISO Standard drawings, this may not be acceptable yet.  If this is the case, drag the leader so that it lines up with the dimension line, and the text is outside of the extension lines.  This requires a little bit of eyeballing, but nothing that is going to give you a headache.
Offset Text on a Dimension

Align leader of Offset Text to Dimension Line

Now for something somewhat different, check out Angles and their relationships for information on different types of angles.

Senseless Sunday: Mammoth Stars

  1. The last pyramids in Egypt where finished before the last of the Woolly Mammoths died out.1 2
  2. The World as we know it was designated to end by a Viking myth on 2/22/20143 and by a modern economist on 3/4/2014.4  The quote from War Games rings through my head right now about “We’re still here!  We’re STILL HERE!”.
  3. Our Solar System is traveling at an average speed of 514,000 mph relative to the Milky Way galactic center.5

A look around the blogsphere

There are generally a lot interesting posts following SolidWorks World.  Here is a short sample this year:

HomeByMe… imagine, design, and share 3D housing projects
CIDEON Workspace Makes a Connection Between SAP and SolidWorks
SolidWorks World and CATI Day 3
Bam! Zok! Poit! Get Hit With What’s Coming in SolidWorks 2015
Dassualt Systèmes makes $750m sciences acquisition
SolidWorks World 2014 – Day 2 Recap
INSPIRATION! (Or, what I learned at SolidWorks World 2014)
THE JOURNEY FROM USER TO CSWE
SolidWorks:HEARD! – Episode 467 – SWW14: New Products
FIRST LOOK: THE MARKFORGED ‘MARK ONE’ CARBON FIBER 3D PRINTER AT SOLIDWORKS WORLD 2014
eDrawings Meetings preview – will be augmented reality evolution
Enable Innovation with SolidWorks Mechanical Conceptual

DimXpert at SolidWorks World 2014

DimXpert presentations seemed to get a lot of interest at SolidWorks World 2014.  Both sessions I attended had full rooms.

DimXpert Break-out
DimXpert Break-out Session

DimXpert Hands-on Session
DimXpert Hands-on Session

All The Uses of DimXpert, a Monday morning session by Josh Spencer of  3DVision Technologies was over flowing with interested attendees.  Josh went into detail about what to use DimXpert for and how to use it.  He described how to leverage DimXpert in TolAnalyst and SolidWorks Drawings.

Introduction to DimXpert and Tolanalyst, a Monday afternoon session by Brian McElyea of Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation was also a full session, not just with hands-on attendees, but also observers from the session’s wait list.  Brian walked attendees through hands-on usage of DimXpert and TolAnalyst with a castor assembly.

DimXpert was also featured in several Model Based Definition break-out sessions, including my own presentation on Wednesday called Model Based Definition in the Context of SolidWorks, where I went into detail about the various methods used to employ Model Based Definition and how to set up and use SolidWorks for best results.

I am interested to see how others are interested in DimXpert.  Was the interest shown at SolidWorks World 2014 a fluke or indicative of general interest within Industry?